Grmio lost three field orders due to fights in the match with Cruzeiro

picture: Reproduction/FC Player

The match between Grmio and Cruzeiro was marked by fights in the tricolor viewers

Grmio have been punished this Tuesday with the lack of three Serie B field targets for the mass brawl amongst their followers in the 2-2 draw with Cruzeiro at the Arena in Porto Alegre on August 21.

If the punishment is upheld in plenary, the recreation towards Sport this Tuesday (20) might be Tricolor’s final at the Arena in this version of Serie B. The video games towards CSA, Bahia and Brusque may have to be performed elsewhere.

Because of the confusion amongst the tricolors of the Arena, the gacho membership was additionally punished with a high-quality of 100 thousand Brazilian {dollars} by a majority of the auditors of the Second Disciplinary Commission.

In the 2-2 draw between Grêmio and Cruzeiro, the referee spoke out for the habits of the Grêmio followers.

I inform you that in the twenty seventh minute of the first half the recreation was stopped for 3 minutes and in the thirty third minute of the first half it was stopped once more for 4 minutes, each stoppages being attributable to a common altercation between followers. who have been in the designated residence group zone. I might additionally like to inform you that at each instances the intervention of the police was crucial to finish the conflict. After the match we have been knowledgeable by the Chief of Police that the individuals concerned had been arrested and recognized.“.

After analyzing the doc and the movies of the disputes, the STJD prosecutor’s workplace condemned Grmio for the lack of assure and safety for the match (Article 211 of the CBJD – high-quality from R$ 100 to R$ 100 thousand) and for not taking measures to stop of problems (Article 213, level I of the CBJD – high-quality from 100 to 100 thousand R$). And, emphasizing the seriousness of the information, he added the lack of field management to the criticism (§1 of Article 213 of the CBJD – lack of management from one to ten video games). Penalties might be cumulative as described in Section 184 of the CBJD.

Deputy Chief Prosecutor Gustavo Silveira made the request for punishment to Grmio.

The state of affairs could be very severe. a sector already banned by STJD because it is called a battle sector by Grmio followers. We see that this pedagogical punishment was not adopted by the followers, a lot in order that they did it once more, twice in the identical recreation. Should we anticipate somebody to die, to be severely injured? The footage communicate for themselves, two common confusions, raised picket cables, individuals leaping over the wire to attempt to save themselves. The very severe case ought to be punished in accordance to“, mentioned.

Rapporteur Washington Oliveira voted for the punishment of the gacho membership primarily based on Article 213 of the CBJD and for the acquittal quantity 211.

These are acts of immense savagery and the recidivism of the Guild should even be thought-about. There is repeated observe in this sense by Gremio followers. Here we see individuals in an act of collective enmity, one thing completely reprehensible. I subsequently settle for the enchantment and apply the penalty of three video games lack of command to Grmio with a high-quality of R$ 100 thousand in view of the ceiling of Article 213. I additionally suggest that the golf equipment maintain the followers answerable for damages brought about, since usually the solely place that hits individuals, is the monetary facet“, voted the rapporteur.

Auditors Iuri Engel and Marcelo Vieira highlighted Grmio’s investigative work to determine offending followers and differed from the reporter by making use of lack of field instructions and a high-quality of R$ 50 thousand in article 213. Auditor Diogo Maia and president in train, Carlos Eduardo Cardoso, traced the dosimetry of the penalty imposed by the reporter.

Thus, Grmio was unanimously acquitted of the enchantment primarily based on Article 211 of the CBJD, and by a majority of the votes was fined R$ 100 thousand and punished with the lack of three field instructions in Article 213, level I. , § 1 of the ZBJD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.