The government of Rio de Janeiro makes changes to the Maracana Edict

The Civil Chamber of the Government of Rio de Janeiro printed an modification to the Maracana’s public announcement in the Official Gazette this Wednesday. Two members have been included, altering one and excluding one other. The updates have already been made in Annex II of the public announcement, which is a draft of the contract and is obtainable on the concession’s web site.

The most related change for the golf equipment, which has already been the topic of dialogue in court docket, is for the value of the stadium hire. Article 13.2.2 was included in the part relating to “Obligations of the Concessionaire”. He says:

“The potential concessionaire should set up yearly, for official soccer matches, a hard and fast and decided value for the pitch rental and working prices of the cell panel at the Journalista Mario Filho Stadium (Maracana), a worth that have to be charged equally to every by the soccer golf equipment in the state of Rio de Janeiro with an official date in the foremost soccer competitions (Brazilian championships “A” and “B” sequence, Copa do Brasil, Copa Libertadores, Copa Sul Americana or another match of this nature and scope that may are carried out throughout the concession interval)”.

That is, if a membership receives the concession, it would have to hire the stadium to one other crew that doesn’t handle the Maracana, for the similar quantity it pays.

The problem has already been mentioned in court docket. When Vasco went to court docket to get the proper to play in the stadium, it additionally requested to pay the similar quantity of hire as Fluminense, which it co-administrators with Flamengo and which collectively have been the Maracana Consortium. In the request, the Maltese cross needed to pay 90 thousand Brazilian {dollars}. But a court docket in Rio de Janeiro ordered the membership to pay R$250,000 in hire.

Another inclusion was Article 23.1.1, which offers with the matter of “shared danger” and removes legal responsibility on either side if insurance coverage insurance policies are taken out and incidents are reported promptly. And the change was in clause 44, which talks about “return of property” and solely the time period “helpful life” was included at the finish of clause 44.4, which offers with the circumstances for conserving stadium gear.

And the exclusion was from merchandise 47.2, from the part that talks about “battle decision”. The textual content mentioned:

“If the events don’t attain an settlement in case of inner conflicts, the dispute might be resolved by way of a binding opinion that might be issued by the General State Prosecutor’s Office, in accordance with the provisions of State Decree No. 46,522 of December 10, 2018.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.